<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>GUI</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rarepattern.com/tags/gui"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://rarepattern.com/taxonomy/term/145/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://rarepattern.com/taxonomy/term/145/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2007-01-25T20:38:16-06:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Joost as good as the content it has</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rarepattern.com/nodes/2007/04/joost-as-good-as-the-content-it-has" />
    <id>http://rarepattern.com/nodes/2007/04/joost-as-good-as-the-content-it-has</id>
    <published>2007-04-05T23:09:31-05:00</published>
    <updated>2007-04-05T23:10:34-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laura Scott</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Comcast" />
    <category term="convergence" />
    <category term="GUI" />
    <category term="HDTV" />
    <category term="interactive design" />
    <category term="internet" />
    <category term="Joost" />
    <category term="television" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.joost.com/" title="Joost&amp;trade;"><img src="http://banners.joost.com/joost_002_en_120x240.jpg" alt="Joost&amp;trade;" class="wrapr" /></a>I suppose I should feel like the cool insider for being a Joost beta tester. All I did was fill out a form some time ago.</p>
<p>Joost has a pretty logo, and their website is full of Flashy color. However, the actual Joost application experience is much more monochrome.</p>
<p>I find the GUI a bit clunky, but that's to be expected in beta. It's better than the ridiculously bad Comcast digital cable UI, a little. Personally I found the placement of navigation buttons to be awkward.</p>
<p>I spent only 15 minutes or so in my first try of Joost.  Most of the time I was trying to scroll through channels to find something that actually interested me. This is where the navigation proved a bit challenging. I think my experience was hampered by the fact that I was trying it out at peak hours -- prime time. Maybe in the morning it would be better.</p>
<p>My first impression was that there wasn't all that much on Joost. I can spend hours surfing through what, 500 channels of television on Comcast, and find nothing on. Same with Joost, I fear. In the end, Joost can be only as good as the content it presents. </p>
<p>The low resolution of video is to be expected. You're not going to get high-quality video through the puny ISP bandwidths available today in the US. That puts an imperative on Joost to offer something different, something somehow better -- or at least <i>other</i> -- than what we find on the three-digit cable channels. </p>
<p>Maybe I'm the wrong customer because I'm watching TV on a 42" plasma HDTV. (Hey, it was a deal and it was cheaper than the smaller LCD.) I look at upconverted DVDs and HDTV programs and see something new: details. High resolution is nice.</p>
<p>I'll try Joost again and perhaps share some more thoughts. I hate to leave this post on such a down note, so I'll give it another shot. I want it to be <i>great</i>. I'll settle for okay.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.joost.com/" title="Joost&amp;trade;"><img src="http://banners.joost.com/joost_002_en_120x240.jpg" alt="Joost&amp;trade;" class="wrapr" /></a>I suppose I should feel like the cool insider for being a Joost beta tester. All I did was fill out a form some time ago.</p>
<p>Joost has a pretty logo, and their website is full of Flashy color. However, the actual Joost application experience is much more monochrome.</p>
<p>I find the GUI a bit clunky, but that's to be expected in beta. It's better than the ridiculously bad Comcast digital cable UI, a little. Personally I found the placement of navigation buttons to be awkward.</p>
<p>I spent only 15 minutes or so in my first try of Joost.  Most of the time I was trying to scroll through channels to find something that actually interested me. This is where the navigation proved a bit challenging. I think my experience was hampered by the fact that I was trying it out at peak hours -- prime time. Maybe in the morning it would be better.</p>
<p>My first impression was that there wasn't all that much on Joost. I can spend hours surfing through what, 500 channels of television on Comcast, and find nothing on. Same with Joost, I fear. In the end, Joost can be only as good as the content it presents. </p>
<p>The low resolution of video is to be expected. You're not going to get high-quality video through the puny ISP bandwidths available today in the US. That puts an imperative on Joost to offer something different, something somehow better -- or at least <i>other</i> -- than what we find on the three-digit cable channels. </p>
<p>Maybe I'm the wrong customer because I'm watching TV on a 42" plasma HDTV. (Hey, it was a deal and it was cheaper than the smaller LCD.) I look at upconverted DVDs and HDTV programs and see something new: details. High resolution is nice.</p>
<p>I'll try Joost again and perhaps share some more thoughts. I hate to leave this post on such a down note, so I'll give it another shot. I want it to be <i>great</i>. I'll settle for okay.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Comcast makes a bad user interface just a bit worse</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rarepattern.com/nodes/2007/01/comcast-makes-a-bad-user-interface-just-a-bit-worse" />
    <id>http://rarepattern.com/nodes/2007/01/comcast-makes-a-bad-user-interface-just-a-bit-worse</id>
    <published>2007-01-25T21:36:50-06:00</published>
    <updated>2007-01-25T20:38:16-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laura Scott</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Comcast" />
    <category term="design" />
    <category term="GUI" />
    <category term="television" />
    <category term="usability" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It was already bad enough, the kludgy UI that didn't even qualify for <em>G</em>UI, where moving through the channel selections was less like surfing and more like creeping up and down with a walker and orthopedic shoes.</p>
<p>Now, without improving a thing, Comcast has added on-screeen ads at the bottom of each guide screen. Not only that, as you scroll through the ads, the cursor ends up including the ads in the sequence, making it that much harder to go through the guide.</p>
<p>Digital cable is now that much less usable. Just lovely.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It was already bad enough, the kludgy UI that didn't even qualify for <em>G</em>UI, where moving through the channel selections was less like surfing and more like creeping up and down with a walker and orthopedic shoes.</p>
<p>Now, without improving a thing, Comcast has added on-screeen ads at the bottom of each guide screen. Not only that, as you scroll through the ads, the cursor ends up including the ads in the sequence, making it that much harder to go through the guide.</p>
<p>Digital cable is now that much less usable. Just lovely.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
