<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>rare pattern</title>
  <subtitle>thoughts in a blog</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rarepattern.com/nodes/2006/03/on-the-quest-for-finding-a-favorite-favorites-function"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://rarepattern.com/node/37/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://rarepattern.com/node/37/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2006-03-08T14:08:54-06:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>On the quest for finding a favorite favorites function</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rarepattern.com/nodes/2006/03/on-the-quest-for-finding-a-favorite-favorites-function" />
    <id>http://rarepattern.com/nodes/2006/03/on-the-quest-for-finding-a-favorite-favorites-function</id>
    <published>2006-03-08T10:07:06-06:00</published>
    <updated>2006-03-08T14:08:54-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laura Scott</name>
    </author>
    <category term="blogs" />
    <category term="internet" />
    <category term="technology" />
    <category term="web design" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Since they launched it a week or so ago, <a href="http://technorati.com/faves/lauras">I've been playing with the Technorati Favorites</a> feature. I know that this kind of centralized site tracking is nothing new, but call me a curmudgeon for not appreciating <a href="http://privacy.yahoo.com/privacy/us/beacons/details.html">Yahoo's pernicious tracking of all your browsing everywhere</a>. Yes, there are alternatives, but this is where I am this week. (I reserve the right to change my mind tomorrow, though.)</p>
<p><img src="/system/files?file=technoratifaves1.jpg" alt="technorati faves" title="A lot of dead space here" /></p>
<p>One problem with the favorites is that Technorati leaves so little space for actual content. Count me as one of the people who has a monitor larger than 800x600, and find a lot of dead space on the page. This screenshot I took just now has about 550px of live content, and the rest of the roughly 1300px of width is dedicated to a sidebar laden with ads and promotions (about 220px) and a whole lotta white space (some 500px worth). For a page that's supposed to be my resource for tracking sites I like, it's not very efficient.</p>
<p>(Side question: How many Technorati-savvy users actually use 800x600 monitors these days?)</p>
<p>With such limited real estate available, I think I'm going to have to go back to a desktop solution, even though that doesn't feel as fun. At the very least, I think I'm going to have to drop <a href="http://boingboing.net">BoingBoing</a> from the list -- they are just too prolific. My faves page has become a BoingBoing feed. I'll just have to go there on my own.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Since they launched it a week or so ago, <a href="http://technorati.com/faves/lauras">I've been playing with the Technorati Favorites</a> feature. I know that this kind of centralized site tracking is nothing new, but call me a curmudgeon for not appreciating <a href="http://privacy.yahoo.com/privacy/us/beacons/details.html">Yahoo's pernicious tracking of all your browsing everywhere</a>. Yes, there are alternatives, but this is where I am this week. (I reserve the right to change my mind tomorrow, though.)</p>
<p><img src="/system/files?file=technoratifaves1.jpg" alt="technorati faves" title="A lot of dead space here" /></p>
<p>One problem with the favorites is that Technorati leaves so little space for actual content. Count me as one of the people who has a monitor larger than 800x600, and find a lot of dead space on the page. This screenshot I took just now has about 550px of live content, and the rest of the roughly 1300px of width is dedicated to a sidebar laden with ads and promotions (about 220px) and a whole lotta white space (some 500px worth). For a page that's supposed to be my resource for tracking sites I like, it's not very efficient.</p>
<p>(Side question: How many Technorati-savvy users actually use 800x600 monitors these days?)</p>
<p>With such limited real estate available, I think I'm going to have to go back to a desktop solution, even though that doesn't feel as fun. At the very least, I think I'm going to have to drop <a href="http://boingboing.net">BoingBoing</a> from the list -- they are just too prolific. My faves page has become a BoingBoing feed. I'll just have to go there on my own.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
